Have an idea? It's your money!
I love this! reply
by SEAANDRA RICHARDSON
34 days ago
Beautiful! reply
If anyone owns this dress, does it have any front seams on the skirting? reply
by CANDY CULTURE
35 days ago
Great outfit! reply
Still one of my favorite dresses on this site. (I just have to purchase one. haha) reply
The print came out super cute. You look great! reply
The skirting is fantastic. Love this idea! reply
this is awesome reply
by NICOLE BAISCH
Everyday women's wear in Gothic style. Your selected part will be asked by 'Is it everyday wear?' and 'Is this Gothic?', both will be parts of your average score rating. Shirts and dresses only, no back images.
by Gary Jiang (Chic Star)
36 days ago
This is nice! reply
by J W
I'd love to own this. reply
Hello Guylian, Thank you for your suggestion. Actually at the beginning of accepting ideas, we allow plain images and designers add prints on it. But the result doesn't look good. The plain dresses focus on details and print dresses focus on body and silhouette (expect for prints itself), that's the reason why we only allow ideas in print dresses. Hope it helps. Thank you. reply
What I mean is that you can accept the plain images as ideas and then have people submit them with prints if they reach template stage. Your wholesale customers may want printed retro clothes at the moment but they won't care if the original idea it came from was plain, only that the final product is printed. reply
by GUYLIAN K
37 days ago
This is a gorgeous photo. Best of luck to you! reply
Seaandra, this isn't your idea. That's the point. You can be inspired by a print and make one with the same vibe, but what you did is make a carbon copy of someone else's work with the exception of one cherry. I'd like to be spending my time on here actually designing and not having to google your work - many of which have been re-colored prints from free websites. I'm tired of it. I wrote this for the print makers who spend HOURS designing their patterns from scratch: Anna-Maria Syk, Julie Rojas, Patricia Sipes, Amber Middaugh and myself. If you are so pressed about me not liking your copies, how about you stop and actually draw it on your own. The fact that you submit dozens of prints a week shows me that you do the minimum amount of work for the most gain. Maybe being ethical doesn't pay, but at least I can say that my prints were 100% created by me. I don't buy what you're trying to sell me, what you did was download this print and then edited out the cherry that's supposed to be on the pink cupcake. That's my conspiracy, allegedly. Oh, and tracing is against copyright law, just so you know - it's called a derivative work. If the prints aren't copyright free, then CS can be sued. As far as print re-colors and submitting copyright free material, you're not the only one who has been doing this. Another person has been submitting prints from free websites without changing a thing. But this isn't about her; it's about you. And I hope that she sees this and realizes that doing shady things is not cool - especially when you call yourself a designer. I've said my peace and I'll leave it alone. Oh and sorry, not sorry about hating the over saturation of floral prints. reply
Cute! reply
Candy, I liked the design so I hand drew my own rendition of it. Why do I feel as if you are being so negative towards some of my ideas? reply
38 days ago
Hello Guylian, Thank you very much for the remainder. Yes we are aware we're missing some good retro ideas in plain. Currently our focus is print retro dress with digital printing fabric to develop variety products. We may consider plain retro style in the future. Thanks again. reply
Gary, you need to know that by limiting retro ideas to images with prints only, you are missing out on a lot of really great ideas, just because they happen to be plain. Especially when the printed image idea is then rendered back into a plain image for voting anyway. Just saying. reply
39 days ago
Hello Anna, At this time we don't add embroidery to products, that's the reason why we don't include it in the idea. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank you. reply
40 days ago